Several Western Canadian oil storage and pipeline infrastructure projects have been delayed or indefinitely put on hold while crude prices remained relatively weak but Oil Sands production increased.
Between January 2011 and June 2014, West Texas Intermediate prices scarcely dropped below $80/bbl, leading to announcements of major infrastructure projects, many of which were expected to be put into service by the end of 2016. But, as the price of oil began to fall throughout the second half of 2014 and most of 2015, companies such as Enbridge and TransCanada put projects on hold, despite increasing production.
Alberta Bitumen crude production in December 2015 averaged 1.541mn bpd, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator, which was within 1 percent of Genscape’s Canadian production forecast of 1.528mn bpd for the same month and year. Production in December 2015 was up 17.9 percent from December 2014 levels of 1.307mn bpd, according to the AER. This trend has continued into 2016, aside from the month of May, where production drastically fell due to the Alberta wildfires, according to data showed on the Government of Alberta’s Economic Dashboard.
Production pushes forward, expansions push back
Though Western Canadian crude production has increased in recent years a decline in shipper demand has caused infrastructure construction schedule changes. A low crude price environment has coupled with a narrowing of the price spread between WTI and Western Canadian Select spot prices to cause a decline in economic arbitrage opportunities for crude shippers.
In January 2013, the price discount of WCS to the WTI Calendar Month Average was $32.65/bbl, and averaged $22.40/bbl through 2014. From January 2015 to June 2016, it averaged $13.22/bbl and never exceeded $20/bbl, according to Energy Information Administration and Alberta Energy data.
According to the Alberta Energy Regulator, Western Canadian Bitumen crude production averaged 1.111mn bpd from January 2013 through December 2014, and averaged 1.406mn bpd in 2015.
A weaker WTI price may discourage infrastructure investment, as the revenue that commercial shippers receive is derived from this price. However, when transporting crude from northern Alberta, shippers also have to consider the price of WCS. In a typical scenario, shippers pay the cost of the WCS crude as well as the cost of transportation to Cushing, OK, where they sell it relative to the WTI benchmark price. If the costs become greater to ship WCS to the United States than the WCS discount to WTI, investments may be discouraged because of a lack of willing contract shippers.
Typically, before a pipeline or tank farm is built, shippers will sign binding long-term contracts with oil companies called take-or-pay contracts. Under these contracts, shippers must pay a fixed amount to the oil companies whether they choose to ship any oil or not. This ensures revenue for the midstream companies, but also gives shippers some degree of influence as to when a project commences.
Enbridge delays Athabasca Twin Pipeline to 2017
In a 2015 annual report filed with the SEC, Enbridge said that the price environment had affected shippers on Enbridge’s pipelines, who reacted to the low prices by “reducing investment in exploration and development programs for 2015.” Additionally, it has caused some sponsors of oil sands development programs to “reconsider the timing of previously announced upstream development projects.”
These comments are reflected in the delay of Enbridge’s Athabasca Twin Pipeline, a 450,000 bpd expansion of their Athabasca Mainline that traverses from the Oil Sands region to Enbridge’s tank farm in Hardisty, AB, where volumes can connect to their mainline system. Originally scheduled to be in-service by 2015, the project was delayed to 2017 in the second half of 2014 “at the request of Enbridge’s shippers,” according to Enbridge. To further consolidate, Enbridge decided to combine the expansion with their Wood Buffalo Extension, another pipeline expansion in the Oil Sands area, which would increase the capacity of ATP to 800,000 bpd and deliver “significant toll savings” to their shippers.
TC Terminal, Heartland Pipeline delayed indefinitely: TransCanada
Similarly, TransCanada said in a 2015 annual report filed with the SEC that changes in the price environment may lead shippers to choose to “accelerate or delay certain new [production] projects,” which could “impact the timing for the demand of transportation services and/or new liquids pipeline infrastructure.” TransCanada has had multiple project delays in the past year.
In 2013, TransCanada announced the TC Terminal and Heartland Pipeline projects. The TC Terminal would consist of six crude storage tanks, increasing the overall capacity in the Alberta Heartland region by 1.9mn bbls. The Heartland Pipeline would connect the terminal to Edmonton, AB, and Hardisty, and would have an estimated capacity of 900,000 bpd, according to TransCanada. The Heartland Pipeline progress has been affected by regulatory permitting delays of the Keystone XL and Energy East projects, which would connect to the Heartland Pipeline, according to TransCanada’s President of Liquids Pipelines Paul Miller during a financial results conference call on July 31, 2015. However, TransCanada said in the annual report that the projects would be delayed indefinitely, saying that “the in-service date for the projects will be determined and aligned with industry conditions and customer’s requirements.”
TransCanada’s Grand Rapids Pipeline project has also been delayed, with a new in-service date for part of the project to be issued when there is “subject to sufficient market demand,” according to TransCanada’s 2015 fourth quarter earnings report. The project will be built as a dual pipeline system, a 20-inch, 330,000 bpd diluent and crude line and a 36-inch, 900,000 bpd blended crude line. Phase one of the project consists of the entire 20-inch line extending from the Oil Sands region to Edmonton and a section of the 36-inch pipeline between Edmonton and Fort Saskatchewan, near the Alberta Heartland region. Phase two will see the construction of the remainder of the 36-inch line and a reversal of the 20-inch line, allowing it to transport diluent up to the Oil Sands region.
In the second half of 2015, TransCanada entered into an agreement with Keyera Corp. to deliver diluent from Keyera’s Edmonton terminal to TransCanada’s Heartland Terminal, where TransCanada is constructing a 350,000-bbl crude blend tank and a 150,000-bbl diluent tank, which have also been delayed. Originally with an in-service date of 2016, phase one was set back to 2017, with phase two delayed indefinitely.
Heartland, Oil Sands infrastructure expansions expected in 2017
Despite recent delays, 2017 infrastructure demand is on track. However, this could be subject to change dependent on future crude oil prices, as was the case with projects expected to come online in 2015 and 2016.
Enbridge’s Norlite Pipeline will transfer 130,000 bpd of diluent from Enbridge’s Heartland terminal up to the Oil Sands region in the second quarter of 2017, according to Enbridge. It is also expected have connectivity to other diluent terminals in the area, such as Pembina’s Canadian Diluent Hub, which also has an expected in-service date of 2017. The hub will provide an additional 500,000 bbls of aboveground storage to an existing 500,000 bbls of underground storage.
Storage expansions in 2017 should increase diluent storage capacity by 650,000 bbls and crude capacity by 350,000 bbls in the Alberta Heartlands region. The commissioning of the pipelines will have the capacity to create an additional 1.13mn bpd of volume flowing south from the Oil Sands region, and 130,000 bpd of diluent flowing north, along with the 330,000 bpd of diluent flowing between Edmonton and the Heartland region.
Access the most detailed, comprehensive oil production forecast across the significant oil producing regions in Canada with Genscape's Canadian Crude Oil Production Forecast. Genscape's approach includes detailed well and project-level production data from major oil producing areas in Canada, including unconventional/conventional oil production, oil sands in-situ project and upgrader level analysis. Likewise, the forecast is stacked against pipeline takeaway capacity, pipeline production receipts and rail transport to give a detailed analysis of how the crude is getting to market. Click here to learn more about Genscape's Canadian Crude Oil Production Forecast.
Genscape's soon-to-launch Canadian Pipeline Service will provide unprecedented insight into critical crude oil pipeline flows traversing the Canada-United States border. Market participants can use the data to gain insight into U.S. crude imports by pipeline from Canada, as well as crude flows from the U.S. By providing transparency in this area, Genscape has altered the trading landscape, offering market participants an unmatched platform for use in trading and hedging strategies. To may learn more about this product or register your interest here.